On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Lester Caine <les...@lsces.co.uk> wrote: > > My point here is that the WAY information provides all of the direction > details. [snip] > The area detail is simple defined areas 'grouped' with the way or ways that > make up the > route.
So in that case, you seem to be suggesting that a "directed area" can be modeled as just a *relation* with an area and a way as members. Sounds fairly ok to me. But it does raise some questions as to what extent relations would need to be used to link areas with ways. I guess it's only applicable for highway=*'s? Needs more thought... _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
