On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Liz <ed...@billiau.net> wrote: > On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Roy Wallace wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Cartinus <carti...@xs4all.nl> wrote: >> > On Monday 30 November 2009 22:25:36 Roy Wallace wrote: >> >> 1) I can convince you guys that this approach is the best way to get >> >> global consistency, and that that's important; >> >> 2) people realise that editors can be used to avoid additional >> >> keystrokes and so there is actually no cost in adding foot=yes; >> > >> > I've been told that when OSM started (I wasn't involved then) that every >> > motorway had to be tagged horse=no+foot=no+bicycle=no. >> > >> > There is a reason they stopped doing that. >> >> The reason is that that's *globally* redundant. >> > > not exactly correct. > We do have highway marked motorway in Au where bicycles are allowed.
Ok, rephrased: the reason they stopped is because it wasn't necessary. Obviously, we have a problem here. I'm suggesting some solutions. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk