2009/12/6 Anthony <o...@inbox.org>: > No sense in wasting everyone's time if the OSMF members aren't going to > agree to it anyway?
I'm pretty sure he meant asking contributors before threatening to remove their contributions. > It'll still be there. In perfect form for the fork which will inevitably > arise. Which will be a real shame, this is where Google will really get it's claws in because people will be able to map without worrying about data disappearing. > It isn't applicable to data in jurisdictions where data can't be > copyrighted. Part of the proposal of switching to the ODbL is to go > *beyond* copyright law by imposing an EULA (which you are deemed to have > accepted simply by visiting the OSM website. That's the part that worries > me, and which I suppose will cause me to stop contributing (I haven't > completely decided yet, though). Click through type agreements have already been deemed as unenforceable, so I fail to see how agreeing to this by visiting a site would be more enforceable? _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
