-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 SteveC schreef: > I have no idea what that means.
I had no idea about reciprocal license either. > Ask Google. It might have something to do with the fact that they > want to own all the data. Hint hint. I have asked Google; Tim was sitting there too. The only thing *we* have to present is a business case why it would be good for Google to provide us the 'can trace' material. I think the best business case would be: "We trace your photo's for OSM, we provide you the traces." I see a total win-win here. Anyone that wants to make OSM better can help OSM by contributing to OSM and GoogleMaps. This is not cheap labor, this is value for photo's. >> I don't see how CM can compete in giving back new data, opposed to >> Google. > > See above. The world has moved on from thinking Google is a > benevolent force, get with the times. And so do they about CM... and probably any company that doesn't give them Christmas presents. Stefan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEAREKAAYFAksdO7EACgkQYH1+F2Rqwn0QdgCgg5HtkAHX8NNijTrQw4Cggh6i i4UAmgNUP55QVRwi9GoSY+g0kwy9Og9Z =CMdO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
