On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 5:11 AM, Steve Bennett <stevag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1) Not sure why you're using "highway=unclassified" - you know
> "unclassified' is a particular type of road, right? Whereas cycleways can
> occur on almost any kind of road. So you probably should write something
> like "highway=<whatever>".

The problem is the <whatever> or <*> could be interpreted as
highway=cycleway as well. I will improve that and add a footnote.

> 2) In example L1a, I have a strong preference for using existing tags
> (cycleway=lane) if possible, rather than introducing new, unsupported tags
> (cycleway:left=lane). Similarly for M4 and probably others.

But it is documented in
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway since a while and is
about 100 times in osmdoc. The problem with cycleway=lane is that the
wiki never says clearly if it is for both sides and both directions or
if it can apply for one side only.

> 3) Make it clearer in the intro that these examples are all for a
> right-drive country.

Done

> 4) Avoid using "same as <...>" - just restate it, imho.

Hmm, but the advantage of this is when tagging evolves, we are sure it
is edited once for all.

> 5) IMHO it's a bit confusing that "Way A" is the right-hand side way.
>
> 6) You could also add "cycleway=no" where appropriate.

where ?

> 7) You don't make allowance for segregated cycleways
> ("tracks"/copenhagen-style lanes) that aren't represented as distinct ways.
> Is "highway=residential, cycleway=track" not possible?

You mean for T1 and T2 but with only one way in OSM, right (the track
is not traced separately) ? I didn't know it was called the
"copenhagen-style". I will add it but not as a recommended solution.

> 8) Since I don't think we have total consensus on how to map all this stuff,
> it might be worth setting up multiple columns to show how different groups
> are currently mapping, and using that to work towards consensus.

I would prefere multiple rows (see previous point).

I can also add more examples if someone asks for it.

Pieren

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to