On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Jean-Marc Liotier <j...@liotier.org> wrote:
> That would be using a map as an item in a to-do list. It would look ugly > to me and I doubt that many people would support that use. Better keep > the todo list separate - in another layer if you want it represented > geographically. > Yes and no. A straight line works almost as well for routing as a correctly surveyed road, and much better than a non-existent way. So rather than a "to do list", it's more like a first draft. You might say that in order of priority, we would like the following information about every road: 1) Start and end point 2) Major junctions 3) Name 4) Minor junctions 5) Exact route. 6) Surface 7) Width, lanes, speed limit... The order is debatable though. Steve
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
