Hi, Frédéric Bonifas wrote: > If there is a better method, then the only thing to do is to revert > the changeset 3632884 : > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/3632884
This import does not meet normal OSM import quality standards and under normal circumstances I would probably revert it until someone has the time & diligence to do it properly. (The boundaries do not re-use the existing coastline but instead duplicate it in a rough form; where tho administrative areas meet, ways are not re-used either but duplicated.) Usually, while we apply the rule "better crappy data than no data at all" for anything surveyed by humans, we are more strict with imports, and we ask people to either do it right or leave it for someone who can. But of course this is an exceptional situation in that many people seem to be using the map data *now* rather than some time later when we had the time to polish it, so it was probably good to import the data, buggy as it is. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
