This IS a picture ! Not drawn ! It coincides with a aftershock location Gert
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Marcus Wolschon [mailto:marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com] Verzonden: maandag 18 januari 2010 21:56 Aan: j...@jfeldredge.com CC: ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen; talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org; OpenStreetMap talk mailing list Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk] Intriguing artifacts in GeoEye data Sounds like buildings drawn precisely from high-res but poorly georeferences aerial photos. Looking at a sat-image you don´t know if not all of that photo is 50 or 200 meters off unless you are on the ground to compare. On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 4:51 PM, John F. Eldredge <j...@jfeldredge.com> wrote: > If only man-made artifacts are displaced, but not the terrain, that must be a > mapping error. An actual earthquake land-shift would have displaced the > terrain, and moved buildings and other artifacts along with the land. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
