Hi,
Julio Costa Zambelli wrote: > > It seams reasonable to surround the pieces of land under some local > government jurisdiction (...) > I do agree with you. In France, we even created a relation to represent land boundaries and another one with territorial waters. Julio Costa Zambelli wrote: > > If it is not the "right" way to do it or there is a better way to do it, > please let me know. > I think the idea is ok in concept, however it faces a few technical problems : - you reach easily the API max members limit (Raising it is not an option for performance reasons) - Even manipulation of such relations under 2000 members is a hard work with traditional editors Here are my views on an hypotetical solution : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/boundary_segment And what we did in france : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/France_boundary_pyramidal_construction -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Boundary-relation-with-5000-members-tp4813529p4814756.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk