Le 01/04/2010 22:45, Someoneelse a écrit : > Frederik Ramm wrote: > >> ... Surely you would create a boundary relation that >> *uses* the way representing the river to construct the boundary - rather >> than tracing the boundary line over the river line and having two >> separate ways? >> > Er, you might - but it doesn't seem to be universal practice! > My practice is drawing a way over the river and sharing the nodes and include it ine the boundary relation (France - Swissland border on the river Doubs). My thought is one is a natural element that can move, the other is "on paper", conventionnal, even if the convention sais the border is the river. -- FrViPofm
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
