On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:04:23 +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Having a "bot flag" would be good for a number of reasons but your > problem would not be solved by that. In my opinion this is not something > we can do in the API (personally I think the "history" tab on the web > page was a big mistake, I would never have put it there). But it could > be done on a third party site. Why not implement it?
Hi Frederik, I looked at one edit from xybot bot script: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4347642 And I see it has "bot" tag. It is possible to provide just as a temporary fix option in History not to show edits that have "bot=yes" tag? Is that also CPU intensive? Cheers. -- pratite me na twitteru - www.twitter.com/valentt blog: http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com linux, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless, ronjenje, pametne kuće registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org. ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic, MSN: valent.turko...@hotmail.com _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
