Le 24/05/2010 11:20, Frederik Ramm a écrit : > Hi, > > Vincent Pottier wrote: >> I have started to implement it as a test : >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/11980 (relation France) >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/934933 (relation >> definition) > > I like the way in which you have created a circular reference by > making 934933 a "parent" and "child" of 11980 at the same time. It is > perfectly valid (twinned cities where each is the other's member would > be a similar situation) but many tool/editor writers handle this > poorly. Your relation will be a nice encouragement for them to fix > their code. > > Bye > Frederik > I know it is a risk of infinite loop for bad tools but - the first version of the relation "definition" had no member, that is not very convienient - for tools keeping a list of definition, it is a way to remember to witch area they apply - maybe it is a way to build a "standard" def that several areas could subscribe (for example holidays period zones of French educational Academies that would apply to several departments) -- FrViPofm
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk