From: Richard Weait <rich...@weait.com> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OSM Postgres table sizes (was: Failed to download 9.5 GB planet) To: talk@openstreetmap.org Date: Thursday, June 24, 2010, 4:28 PM
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Juan Lucas Domínguez Rubio <juan_lucas...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Hello, thanks. > > Solved. I think the problem was that I was downloading the file to a remote disk (R: mapped to \\lanserver\data) > > Another question: after exporting the whole planet (recently) to Postgres, what is the size of the largest table created (which I presume will take up 80% of the whole DB)? based on my planet and minutely mapnik: 8 GB polygon 21 GB line 2 GB point 43 GB nodes 3 GB roads 50 GB ways 4 GB rels overall disk use ~ 130 GB and growing about 2.5 GB/week at the moment. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk Hello, thanks. That's much more than what I expected. With a small example, I obtained a 1:3 ratio between the .osm format and the table size, so I estimated ~50 GB for the whole DB. Regards, Juan Lucas
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
