You should have sent this to the tagging list... On 28 June 2010 21:08, Stan Berka <stan.be...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have frequently a tagging dilemma. See this example: Coburn Rd on this > location: http://osm.org/go/z...@yoeg-- (N of US 2). It was tagged as > residential, but I've been there two days ago and it's a decent "compacted > gravel" road, almost 2-car wide primarily for agricultural use, although it > does connect farms, and probably can be even be used as through-road (to get > from one highway to another). Category residential seemed to me to be > primarily for urban setting. So, the best I thought for this one would be > "track". But this is rendered almost like a path (the dashed line). What are > your thoughts?
In australia we tag these as highway=unclassified http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
