Hi,
Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
I still haven't heard from SteveC or others from OSMF official answer
wouldn't adding SA clause to section 3 in CT help situation a little -
at least it would give contributors a promise that if there another
license change is needed, license still will be SA (in a spirit of
ODBL).
-1
I have heard people complain about many things but not about that
section not enforcing SA for eternity. I don't think it would help the
situation in anyway; it would only further alienate those who don't like
SA. What's on the table right now is a delicate balance between
different interests. Trying to take something away now will upset the
balance.
And honestly, if at any future time two thirds of active OSM
contributors want to change to a non-SA license, why should we keep them
from it? In one or two years, "two thirds of active contributors" will
be a greater number of people than all of us today. Who are we to tell
them what to do? We're the minority ;)
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
