2010/7/19 Andy Allan <gravityst...@gmail.com>: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Peteris Krisjanis <pec...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi again! >> >> I still haven't heard from SteveC or others from OSMF official answer >> wouldn't adding SA clause to section 3 in CT help situation a little - >> at least it would give contributors a promise that if there another >> license change is needed, license still will be SA (in a spirit of >> ODBL). > > Hi Peter, > > The OSMF (i.e. the LWG) isn't likely to give you an answer in the > timeframe you expect - they meet once a week and have a huge > (growing?) amount of things to deal with. Even on a good day it might > take 2-3 weeks for them to get you a response, and if it involves > legal advice maybe even longer. > > I'm not trying to discourage you, just hoping that you realise these > things can take a while, and hoping that you have the patience to > wait! >
Andy, I don't have problem to wait - I and probably lot of other mappers just want to hear straight and honest answer. Cheers, Peter. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
