Anthony wrote: > And who told you that OSM is a collection of unoriginal facts?
I did, last time I did some mapping. I faithfully recorded where the paths, gates and stiles were, rather than pulling some fictitious locations out of my ass. I realise that you've been far too busy trolling the mailing lists this year to actually do much mapping, given that http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Anthony%20/edits shows the grand total of six tiny edits in the last six months. But, you know, some of us are in this project to make a map, not just for the mailing list lulz. Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/OSM-legal-talk-decision-removing-data-tp5370516p5376495.html Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-t...@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
