On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Anthony <o...@inbox.org> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Matt Amos <zerebub...@gmail.com> wrote: >> OSMF is not moving to "a PD license disguised as BY-SA" > > Then why don't they ever talk about the fact that the contents are > going to be released under DbCL?
they do. and it's in the contributor terms: "ODbL 1.0 for the database and DbCL 1.0 for the individual contents of the database". the database is attribution and share-alike. the contents, as facts, hold no copyright - so copyright law can't be used to enforce attribution and share-alike conditions. collections of facts, as databases, can hold rights and can be used to enforce those conditions. cheers, matt _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
