Forgot the link. http://openetherpad.org/h2MuQYeCRP
On 10 August 2010 21:29, steve brown <st...@evolvedlight.co.uk> wrote: > Hey > > I've drafted a potential "OpenStreetMap Community Conduct" page - > would people suggest any changes? And more importantly, to all people > who have already commented or started this thread, would you sign and > abide to this code? > > If you do suggest changes, just go ahead and make them on the page > > Thanks > > Steve > > On 10 August 2010 21:23, F. Heinen <f.heinen...@gmail.com> wrote: >> TimSC >> I agree he is only talking about how the discussion should be conducted but >> OSM needs both. If the project definition is unclear then the discussions >> will also be unclear. The license change is IMHO one of these issues. It is >> not about wrong or right but about >> being clear what the intended goals are and why. >> >> 2010/8/10 TimSC <mapp...@sheerman-chase.org.uk> >>> >>> On 10/08/10 20:40, F. Heinen wrote: >>>> >>>> You can have very valid points and be very right but if the guidelines >>>> tell that the project is defined "red" and you think "blue" is better then >>>> when you making this point time after time then you can be defined as >>>> poisonous (even though you can even be right) as you are draining the >>>> community. >>> >>> What are you talking about? The guidelines SteveC proposed are to moderate >>> how the discussion should be conducted, not how the project is defined! >>> >>> TimSC >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk mailing list >> talk@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >> >> > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
