I think that you and I are using different definitions of "theory".  I am using 
the scientific definition of theory, "an explanation of how a group of facts 
relate to each other".  A theory, using that definition, continues to exist 
even once it has been proven.  You are using the colloquial definition of 
theory, "unproven speculation".  Using either definition, forbidding discussion 
of a conspiracy theory could mean that a real conspiracy would be allowed to 
continue.  However, I do agree that discussion of conspiracy theories has the 
potential to swamp a discussion forum, such as this mailing list.

-------Original Email-------
Subject :Re: [OSM-talk] BDFL & Moderation
>From  :mailto:li...@gimnechiske.org
Date  :Mon Aug 16 01:50:39 America/Chicago 2010


If you can back your claim of conspiracy by some sort of evidence than we can 
conclude that it is not a theory anymore, independent if it is a realy 
conspiracy or not. It is easy to say something in the line of "FBI plotted to 
assassinate JFK", but to prove it is harder, independente if they did or not.
 
A


On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 1:56 PM, John F. Eldredge <j...@jfeldredge.com 
<mailto:j...@jfeldredge.com> > wrote:
 However, should someone uncover a real conspiracy, any attempt to reveal it to 
others would be discussion of a conspiracy theory, and therefore forbidden.  
"Theory" does not mean "nonexistent"; the fact that the theory of gravity 
exists does not mean that gravity does not exist.
 
 --
 John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com <mailto:j...@jfeldredge.com> 
 "Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to 
think at all." -- Hypatia of Alexandria
 



 -----Original Message-----
 From: pdora...@mac.com <mailto:pdora...@mac.com>  (Pierre-Alain Dorange)
 Sender: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org> 
 Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 13:31:36
 To: <talk@openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org> >
 Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] BDFL & Moderation
 
 M?rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com <mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com> > 
wrote:
 
 > >        • No conspiracy theories
 > ...
 >
 > could this be amended by "unless there is a real conspiracy"?
 > Otherwise our hands might be tied in case there is a conspiracy.
 
 "no conspiracy theories" seems clear.
 A real conspiracy is not a theory. "conspiracy theories" are always
 trolls
 
 --
 Pierre-Alain Dorange
 
 
 _______________________________________________
 talk mailing list
 talk@openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org> 
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
 _______________________________________________
 talk mailing list
 talk@openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org> 
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
 
 
-- 
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
"Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to 
think at all." -- Hypatia of Alexandria
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to