Apologies to legal-talk, it would have helped if I had quoted the original proposal that started the thread
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 3:17 AM, ce-test wrote: > A fork as stipulated should not be necessarily about a group of people > leaving OSM , but about we (OSM) deciding to continue in two or more > future > directions, covered by different licenses, and maybe finally decide which > license > fits best. > This would require the OSM database to include a extra field for each > and every item indicating the license the data was provided by its > contributor. > The license choice can be made in the users profile. Cheers David -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Re-OSM-legal-talk-Osmf-talk-The-license-fork-discussion-A-solution-proposal-tp5457206p5457256.html Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-t...@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
