please see this as well, http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ODbL_comments_from_Creative_Commons
they say the odbl is not a copyleft license but a contract... On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 3:59 PM, TimSC <mappingli...@sheerman-chase.org.uk> wrote: > On 28/08/10 14:47, Joe Richards wrote: >> >> For those of us who perhaps haven't watched all of the threads too >> carefully, is there such a thing as a list of the issues the new ODbL was >> intended to address (its pros) and the problems that those who wish to stick >> to the CC-by-SA license perceive with the switch (cons)? > > Here are two lists, but they might not be complete: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Why_You_Should_Vote_Yes > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Why_You_Should_Vote_No > > The ODbL proposal document and supporting pages sums up the pro case quite > well: > > http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/File:License_Proposal.pdf > http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/We_Are_Changing_The_License > > TimSC > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > -- James Michael DuPont Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova and Albania flossk.org flossal.org _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
