Hah! Yeah I've been doing the exact same thing for our Lancaster pa mapping group.
We'll look at it tomorrow and find out what's going on. Fwiw I meant server tilecache, not browser cache. Thanks for finding it and letting us know On Thursday, October 21, 2010, Toby Murray <toby.mur...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hmm well there is definitely something stuck on your end for zoom > levels 8 and 9. I'm on a different computer with two different > browsers now so client side caching can't explain it. Look at Kansas > City (only the KS side) Wichita, Omaha, Oklahoma City and Denver. They > are all bright green blobs at z8-9 but all change to mostly red at > z10+ > > I'll be honest... I was kind of hoping to stroke my ego by zooming out > and then being like "oh look! The only green blob within two hundred > miles is MY city!" but alas at those zoom levels all of the major > cities in my area are (incorrectly) green :) > > Toby > > > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Antony Pegg <anttheli...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Toby, >> >> Glad you like it. >> >> Ok, tiger tiles are meant to refresh basically every 15 minutes ish >> (same as the websites). I got a feeling you got an old cache at the >> further out zoom - Andy made a style update that made it more >> accurate, so yes trust the red more than the green right now. >> >> Remember I am a product manager, not a developer (so basically I stare >> keenly into the middle distance while standing on the shoulders of >> giants) but here's how I understand it works: >> >> To make it go green, you need to either change a tag on the way, or >> add/remove a node from the way, to cause a way versioning to happen. >> If the way has 5 nodes, and you move around the 5 nodes, then it stays >> red, because the way version hasn't changed, only the node versions. >> >> Andy's style update made it more accurate, but I haven't had a chance >> to find out how yet - only to be happy it happened. Totally my fault, >> i plead the rigors of doing two pushes in one week. >> >> HTH and thanks again, >> Ant >> >> On Thursday, October 21, 2010, Toby Murray <toby.mur...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Wow! This is great stuff! >>> >>> I do have some questions about the TIGER edited map. For example, go here: >>> http://open.mapquestapi.com/tigerviewer/index.html?zoom=9&lat=39.10819&lon=-97.54698&layers=B >>> >>> Now zoom in one level. Most of the roads change from green to red. >>> Unfortunately I am inclined to believe the "more red" version since >>> there aren't many mappers in this area, except around Manhattan >>> (towards the east) where I am and most of the roads do indeed reflect >>> that I have touched them. >>> >>> From reading the wiki about the original TIGER edited map it would >>> seem that only ways that are in version 1 are rendered as red. Is This >>> still the case? It looks like there may be some additional logic... >>> User balrog-kun did some nationwide edits in April to expand street >>> names and remove the tiger:upload_uuid tags from tiger data. It looks >>> like these ways are still being rendered as untouched even though the >>> tags did change. But this is a good thing :) >>> >>> Toby >>> >> > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk