>From looking at a few different cities in this map, it is quite telling what areas support the licence and which areas will be devastated by the data loss. Compare for example:
London city: http://osm.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/map/?zoom=13&lat=51.49734&lon=-0.12444&layers=B0 Sydney city: http://osm.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/map/?zoom=13&lat=-33.88527&lon=151.23352&layers=B0 Perth city: http://osm.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/map/?zoom=13&lat=-31.95292&lon=115.91642&layers=B0 I also note, this map only shows the ways that are tagged/edited by certain types of users. What about POIs? A street-map is great and all, but without any indication of what objects are where, it only does half the job. Id like to know, for example, how many petrol stations or public toilets, will be lost if CCBYSA-only data is excluded. Im also curious, can you give an explanation of the 'treemap' you included a link to? David On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 17:41 +0100, Fabian Schmidt wrote: > As the license thermometer[1] turns greener I was interested in how far > this already effects the map data. So using the planet history I took a > closer look on the ways. > > So far 3700 mappers agreed to the new license. Out of 68 million ways 46% > are created and edited only by people who did accept the ODBL. 42% were > not edited by a proponent of ODBL, the remaining 12% of the ways have a > mixed history. You will find a map of the ways colored according to their > license (red = CCBYSA, green = ODBL, yellow = partly ODBL) at > http://osm.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/map/ > > > Fabian. > > [1] http://matt.dev.openstreetmap.org/treemap.png > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
