On 12 Nov 2010, at 11:57, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2010/11/11 Laurence Penney <l...@lorp.org>: >> On 11 Nov 2010, at 20:30, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> IMHO the wiki is clear here: "start_date is the date the construction >>> of feature finished." It is not about the construction being >>> commissioned or started. >> >> The wiki may be clear but that doesn't mean it's any good. Cologne Cathedral >> deserves more dating richness than start_date=1880 and, following the >> current wiki spec, the Sagada Familia won't be allowed a start_date tag >> until around 2050. > > Yes, but you tag for a church sanctification_date and for the > beginning of the constructions construction:start_date (or would that > be start_date:construction ?). Of course you cannot tag all kind of > aspects in one tag. If you are interested in these other dates I > suggest you make a proposal.
All in good time... I just made a proposal about date formatting, so I'll let that settle in people's stomachs first! - L _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk