Rob Myers <r...@robmyers.org> wrote: > On 11/21/2010 08:53 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > > > > Legally they might have to attribute OSM but I'm really thankful > > they don't, because what they have to sell is some shady software > > that claims to be able to "locate" people when in reality it's just > > an x-ray pornocam style rip-off and I would't want to see OSM > > mentioned in that context. > > BY-SA does allow you to request the removal of attribution from > derivative works (BY-SA 2.0 Generic 4.a). This might be useful in > future to preventing OSM becoming associated with any other outbreaks > of pornocamvertising.
How does that work? Does is require all contributors to agree on it?, or is there another way? - Johnny _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-t...@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
