On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 3:39 AM, Elizabeth Dodd <ed...@billiau.net> wrote: > Gert wants OSMF to align "open and free" with a formal definition used > by a respected organisation specialising in "open and free" licences / > software / data.
Who? If CC does it, they probably aren't going to include ODbL (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ODbL_comments_from_Creative_Commons). When I asked freedomdefined.org, I was told by Benjamin Mako Hill that "it's outside our scope, at the moment, but if folks want to think and talk through this, I wouldn't mind someone creating a nice standard and a set of supportng documents on the Freedomdefined wiki and would even like to participate". FSF and OSI are focussed on software. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
