Hello people,
today I've stumbled upon changeset 6682943 [0] in my area, and, digging
further, I found its companions listed in [1].

While I believe this is valuable information, I'm quite puzzled by the import.
In particular, it added nodes also to already well-mapped airports, with
missing information. Compare:

1) node 1042047005, added by the import

aeroway = aerodrome
iata = TPS
name = Trapani / Birgi Airport
source = ourairports.com

2) way 74837437,  pre-existing:

aeroway = aerodrome
closest_town = Trapani
ele = 7
iata = TPS
icao = LICT
name = Aeroporto di Trapani-Birgi
name:en = Trapani-Birgi Airport
name:it = Aeroporto di Trapani-Birgi
source = wikipedia
type = civil;military
wikipedia:en = Trapani-Birgi_Airport


I suspect this kind of different quality is present elsewhere too.

What do you think about reverting these changesets?


Kindly,
David

[0]: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/6682943
[1]: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/6683367
     http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/6683351
     http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/6683322
     http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/6682893
     http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/6680143


-- 
 . ''`.   Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to