On 4 January 2011 00:25, Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 03:24:34PM -0600, Toby Murray wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be> wrote: >> > Having a node to indicate the center of a town/city/... can be >> > useful too, even if you already have a boundary for it. >> >> It seems like duplicate information to me. Like mapping a walmart with >> both a building outline tagged as a shop and a point in the middle >> tagged the same way. What do you define as the "center" of a town? If >> it is just the centroid of the border polygon then this can be >> determined from the boundary. If you mean the central business >> district or town hall, then that should be mapped appropriately with >> landuse and building polygons.
There's a practice to add such a node to the boundary's relationwith the role admin_centre (and other *_centre's I guess), which is easier for a tool to understand than a bunch of building polygons. However, the claim that having both a relation and a place= node is duplicate information is incorrect, it's just a different way to express the admin_centre role. Cheers _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
