On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:40, Andrew Ayre <a...@britishideas.com> wrote:

> What is the point of spreading unfounded FUD? OSM doesn't need Microsoft to
> exist anyway.
>

I think he meant that now that MS will have access to Navteq, there is more
than reasonable doubts regarding their future involvment in OSM...

- Chris -
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to