-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 2011-02-21 16:03, Peter Budny skrev:
> it's capable of capturing; OSM's model is much better IMO. BUT, Waze > has captured traces of a much larger portion of the US than OSM has. > Waze has both average and real-time speed data, whereas OSM has no > provision for this whatsoever. In sweden Waze have pickes over all up a much smaller part, and have much more error, extra parallel roads. Waze is a really usefull tool, i would love them to co-operate with OSM, > Those of you who think all automated or semi-automated data > contributions are harmful to OSM are dooming this project to never be > able to grow to become a leading source of mapping data. The bigger the data base, the less useful automates imports, or I'm i missing something? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk1jXPcACgkQtbR3SXmySreH/wCeJlqqvDvRWusRV/01tc/GFdKA OeAAnjW51C+m6nPFgBCIRv+Yr3HGxCqF =jyFC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk