On 18/04/2011 18:50, Thomas Davie wrote:
Because it will show the genuine trend – at the moment, a quick glance at the graph would suggest that the "no" vote is expanding at the same rate, and at the same level as the "yes" vote. I agree that we can't clearly show that they're not at the same level, because it would involve scaling the "no" vote to 1 100th of the size of the yes vote, but we can clearly show that they're not expanding at the same rate.
I have declined the CTs, but for me it is by no means a 'no' vote. I declined because that was the nearest thing to an 'Ask me later' option: I had read that declines can be reversed, but acceptances cannot. I didn't want to decline, precisely because it would look like I was answering 'no', but I had to because (as I've mentioned elsewhere) I was locked out of all OSM activity (making diary entries, commenting on someone else's diary entry, replying to a PM someone had sent me) until I chose one option or the other. IMO I should only have been locked out of activity that involved editing the map while I made up my mind, but that's not the way it was implemented.
-- Steve _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
