Yes surely that is the situation - use the source tag when using something other than gps.
I have accepted the ToC, TBH I really don't give a monkeys either way though have something of a preference for PD as it keeps life simpler, and I believe the small minority of OS OpenData I have contributed has source=OS OpenData or some such. I really don't care that much even if that is deleted. Nick -----Toby Murray <toby.mur...@gmail.com> wrote: ----- To: talk@openstreetmap.org From: Toby Murray <toby.mur...@gmail.com> Date: 16/06/2011 02:07AM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Can I say "yes" to the ODbL if I can't account for 100% of my data? If only there were a way to indicate the *source* of a given object... This is obviously hindsight and doesn't help at this point in your situation but seriously... The source=* tag: use it. Toby On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:48 PM, john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote: > Exactly my own situation, except following poor advice I accepted the new > CT. Apparently it is not possible to change the CT status and my formal > request to have my suspect data deleted seems to have been ignored. > > My recommendation is not to accept the CT, and reenter those items that you > did from direct observation under a new account. > > Cheerio John > > On 15 June 2011 19:06, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <ava...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Back in 2006 I wrote the following when it still wasn't clear what the >> ODbL acceptance terms would be like: >> >> On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 22:10, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <ava...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > If someone presents me with a boolean "Do you allow relicensing under >> > the ODbL" I'll have to say no because some of my edits are derived >> > from CC-BY-SA data I don't have permission to license (and I probably >> > can't even recall what all of it is). >> > >> > Which'll mean nuking >50% of all the data in Iceland most of which >> > I've touched at some point. >> >> I've been away for a while. But it seems to me from reading the terms >> that I can't say yes to them in good faith, not because I don't want >> to, but because I remember I derived a few things from external >> CC-BY-SA, and I can't now recall what they were (and this was before >> we had changeset comments). >> >> What are my options in that situation? Do I either have to see all my >> work removed because I can't account for 100% of my edits or lie on >> the ODbL acceptance form? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk mailing list >> talk@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk