David Groom wrote: > > As far as I can see, ignoring your specific example, and genearlising, the > "unwanted implication" of your clarification above would be that as long > as > someone deleted the derivate database they had created they could then > claim > it was "temporary" and therefore sidestep the requirements of the ODbL to > distribute it. To avoid this you would thenhave to start defining > "temporary" etc. >
Thanks David. Good point. I think the intention is to avoid that someone mix OSM with proprietary data and makes a produced work out of it without sharing the proprietary data. So let me rephrase it and restrict a bit more /"Temporary software generated files used for the generation of a Produced Work or a Derivative Database that i) contain data from OSM, ii) may contain data from other sources that are a) free and open licensed /(hope there is a definition for that anywhere)/ and b) publicly available iii) do not contain any proprietary data iii) are only created and used for the purpose of the generation of one Produced Work or one Derivative Database, iv) will not be used for any purpose thereafter, v) will not be distributed or made publicly available do not constitute a derivative database, collective database or produced work" / -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Exception-in-Open-Data-License-Community-Guidelines-for-temporary-file-tp6504201p6504373.html Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-t...@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
