On 6 July 2011 07:37, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote: > Now if the mapper comes along and sees the river flagged for deletion, and > remembers that he traveled the river in a boat, and maybe even has the GPX > track, there's nothing to keep him from simply overriding the standard > assumption of "we will have to delete this river". We don't yet have a > mechanism for that; currently the mapper would have to delete and re-create > the river but personally I am in favour of a special, temporary license > override tag that people could add to an object, something like > "i_have_personally_investigated_the_history_of_this_object_and_i_can_vouch_for_it_being_odbl_clean=true".
In both cases, either tagging something as clean or deleting and re-adding assumes good faith, we already know people copy data from incompatible sources, what's to stop someone simple cutting and pasting data or mass tagging ways as clean? _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-t...@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
