On 11/07/2011 22:42, Frederik Ramm wrote:
... But what if I had
1. a facility where I can comment on the perceived usefulness of a
changeset;
2. a facility where I can click a "thumbs down" or "thumbs up" in case
I particularly like or dislike the change;
3. a league table showing the most liked/disliked changesets and their
perpetrators^Wauthors.
Interesting - (like many people I'm sure) I try and incorporate some
idea of "data quality" into the Garmin maps that I create for my own use
(i.e. what to map next), indicating what's likely to have come just from
aerial tracing (and missing out e.g. shop names) and what's likely to be
dodgy GPS traces or not-joined-up-in-potlatch ways. This is all user
based, so a changeset data quality metric (which could be accumulated
into a user data quality metric) would certainly be useful to me.
Cheers,
Andy
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
