I suggest to mark all CC-BY-SA-only objects with a licence-tag instead of deleting them automatically! Start offering zwo plant dumps, one CC-BY-SA-only and one ODbL-only, and than let the users decide which they want to use!
We should only start thinking about removing the CC-BY-SA-only licenced export after both dumps contain identical data or someone really successfully abuses problems of the CC-BY-SA licence! Doing a massive data deletion of all non-ODbL data is just destructive and useless. Especially because nothing forces us to do so! Non-ODbL data will vanish over time by itself. Regards phobie On 23.07.2011 18:11, Tobias Knerr wrote: > In a nutshell: > The Contributor Terms give the OSMF the right to publish OSM data under > the terms of the CC-BY-SA. I suggest that the OSMF should use that > right, and *continue to publish the OSM database under CC-BY-SA* after > the end of the license change process. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-t...@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk