On 07/11/11 15:26, Mikel Maron wrote: > Great stuff! > I think we can improve the rendering and make the tagging clear ... > but for now, this is cool. > > == Mikel Maron == > +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* Michael Krämer <ohr...@googlemail.com> > *To:* talk@openstreetmap.org > *Sent:* Sunday, November 6, 2011 12:09 PM > *Subject:* Re: [OSM-talk] South Sudan: Update border from DoS data > > Hi, > > today I imported and cleaned the data for the border. Everything > should be fine again. > > As discussed I included the disputed areas in the relations for > Sudan and South Sudan such the areas overlap. Amazingly I found > Mapnik now rendering these borders slightly different - at least > in the higher zoom level already available: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=9.7877&lon=24.7817&zoom=13&layers=M > > Probably that's because these borders are only part of one > relation instead of two for a non-disputed border. > > Michael > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk Thank you for these postings on Sudan, please keep them coming.
I think that Sudan, with the border issues, could provide the basis for combining OSM with collaboration tools, such as Compendium : http://compendium.open.ac.uk The Compendium folks have already embedded the dialogue mapping tool into a map. Although its early days for me with OSM and developing this idea. With Thanks, John
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
