Side issue re. Overpass API.... How might it compare with the osm2pgsql route (in performance, and memory usage for the import process) for running a local API for a fairly small area, and with limited data, e.g. highways and wood/water feature polygons in the UK?
I have rather limited memory on my server space (that's just the way it is) - importing data with osm2pgsql can be a challenge, is Overpass more efficient? Thanks, Nick -----Serge Wroclawski <emac...@gmail.com> wrote: ----- To: talk@openstreetmap.org From: Serge Wroclawski <emac...@gmail.com> Date: 22/11/2011 06:03PM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] Overpass API: new big server, IPv6 Roland, Is the Overpass server source code available? - Serge _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
