Yes.
There are a large number of situations were depending on
- sequence of edit operations
- intermediate upload and generation of new object ids
you will get different owners of objects.
This is why it is highly likely that split and mergers will not be
taken in to account in any automatic cleaning of the database
on the switch over.
Essentially we will have some symmetrical collateral damage.
But obviously if you mapped the way, you can go back and
fix the problem -now-.
Simon
Am 14.12.2011 13:31, schrieb john whelan:
I was looking at the map that showed contributions from those who
hadn't agreed to the new terms. One section I found interesting since
I knew I'd mapped it first from a GPS trace I'd made but looking
through the history I noticed another name before mine who hadn't
agreed to the new terms.
I suspect that I'd extended some existing work to save reentering the
highway tags etc. and the history on the existing work was carried
forward to my new work.
Could anyone confirm my hypothesis?
Thanks John
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
