I am not promoting forks, I am promoting making OSM useful and less self
centered.
mike

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Stefan de Konink <ste...@konink.de> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Op 13-01-12 15:40, Mikel Maron schreef:
> > Yes, ideas are great, but consider, this is an OSM list.
>
> Virtually 90% of those idea can be implemented using any dataset
> available. So why would this not be related to OSM?
>
> Stefan
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEAREKAAYFAk8QQ5oACgkQYH1+F2Rqwn3MmACdGPpcGucq20mX8IGfo8Wgelu+
> tGUAn0JoDJ8S/JrTg/tDLt2Dvq+KKFLB
> =Nk8r
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>



-- 
James Michael DuPont
Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to