+1 I don't have a problem with people surveying us for research purposes, even if they do not contribute to the project. What harm does it do?
Obviously surveying us for marketing purposes is rather more iffy, and any survey made for that purpose should be clearly warned as such. Nick -----Richard Fairhurst <rich...@systemed.net> wrote: ----- To: talk@openstreetmap.org From: Richard Fairhurst <rich...@systemed.net> Date: 15/03/2012 11:03AM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Survey about Incentives to contribute to OSM Serge Wroclawski wrote: > This may appear on its surface to be an odd question, especially > to someone in academia, but our community is predicated > on the premise of communal sharing. *ahem* Speak for yourself. I engage with OSM because I believe that open geographic data should exist, and the best way to fix that is by creating it. That's it. I think Dominik's request is entirely reasonable and I'm a little hacked off with the negative-verging-on-paranoid response here. If you don't like it, move on to the next thread and just don't answer the fricking questions. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Survey-about-Incentives-to-contribute-to-OSM-tp5564595p5567648.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
