That's why you need to know the lower of the two classifications being linked (so you can put the link just under the lower one)
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:11 PM, AJ Ashton <aj.ash...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Maarten Deen <md...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > > Is this behaviour of mapnik wanted? As I said: IMHO it is not pleasing to > > the eye to see the unclassified road rendered on top of the primary_link > > road. In order of priority, a *_link road is just below its * counterpart > > but above the next lower road (so primary -> primary_link -> secondary). > > I would guess that, yes, this is the intention. The example you point > out is only minorly aesthetically displeasing. But if links were > rendered on top of unclassified roads, the situation of a link merging > into an unclassified (rather than passing through) would look much > worse. Example: > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2398828/scrot/link_order.png > > Granted, links don't feed into unclassifieds as often as they do > higher classifications of road, but it still happens a lot. > > -- > AJ Ashton > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
