You'd have to ask the City of Utrecht whether their "main cycle routes" are signed. If they've officially identified a particular set of routes, that would seem to be fairly clear-cut. See their city website: http://www.utrecht.nl/images/dso/infraprojecten/fiets/fietsroutes.html
Richard On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Richard Fairhurst <rich...@systemed.net>wrote: > Richard Mann wrote: > > My point is that tagging should allow both types of routes to be > > recorded > > We tag what's on the ground, whether it's route signage, cycle-specific > infrastructure, or a giant woolly mammoth (http://url.ie/f9ts). > > Are you suggesting a deviation from that? > > cheers > Richard > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/OSM-cycle-map-excessive-focus-on-long-distance-routes-tp5697183p5697391.html > Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk