I think we should spend time making maps and not having silly arguments that aren't going to be resolved because there are pros and cons both ways.
Rob - for your purposes - the wiki should describe simple versions of both methods (ignore left and right), credit them both with having virtues, and probably advise people not to go round deleting things if there's no immediate need. Some of this won't be resolved until there's been some tool development, and as RichardF is wont to remind us, that doesn't happen by itself. Richard On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Richard Fairhurst <rich...@systemed.net>wrote: > Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > simply draw cycleways with separate carriageways like any > > other highway with its own way in OSM and you resolve > > lots of issues, including distinct surfaces and restrictions. > > Yes. Absolutely that. > > Things like cycleway=track were a hack back in the day when we only had a > few mappers and barely usable tools, and we needed to grow our coverage as > fast as possible. That's not the case now. We can spend the time to map > things properly (hippy), and we should. > > cheers > Richard > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Cycleways-and-Access-tags-Left-Right-Forward-Backward-tp5709253p5709424.html > Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
