On 28/05/12 23:17, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > > we've had a few cases of "copy-and-paste remapping" reported to DWG, > where in a bid to "save" data from the relicensing axe over-eager > mappers copied and pasted existing data, thereby making the data look as > if it was originally contributed by them. > > This is, obviously, not ok and rather than "save" anything, such actions > stop others from properly remapping the area (because it all looks > clean), and comes back to haunt us later, tarnishinig OSM's reputation. > Later removal of such data will have a knock-on effect of all that has > been built on top. Don't do it. > > Where cases of copy-and-paste remapping are detected, the changesets in > question can be added to the list on this wiki page > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Quick_History_Service/Changeset_Lists#Copy_-_Paste_Remapping > > > and will then be treated during the relicensing process as "tainted", > i.e. the data created in these changesets will not be kept. >
Is it useful to revert these changes ? Did not get any news about the process the last weeks. cu colliar
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk