On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Lester Caine <les...@lsces.co.uk> wrote:
> Only if they can prove that anonymous activity on one is directly related > to some identified activity on the other at an unrelated time ... I am sure > a court would only accept a proven pattern rather than a vague relationship. > > I have a fixed IP address, so am identified, but I'm still happy that > viewing a similar area does not constitute proof of any copying. > Why an unrelated time? If they can find views (maybe even searches) for 1 or multiple areas and correlate those with 1 or multiple changesets on OSM they have the proof they want. Greets, Floris
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
