Hi Johan,

On 01/03/2013 10:53 PM, Johan C wrote:
I´m quite surprised that so few OSM´ers are interested in discussing
the approach to gain market share for OSM. After my first posting mid
 December now Waze is in the news, with up to 30 million users:

http://techcrunch.com/2013/01/02/is-apple-plotting-a-route-to-a-waze-acquisition-rumours-on-the-road-point-to-yes/

 Any more ideas to the strategic issue of increasing market share for
 Openstreetmap?

What market are we discussing here? Waze looks like some "social" application which does not actually do too much but is nicely put together and promoted, probably also got some funding from venture capital and now it's "cool".

My thoughts about OSM in this context:

1. OSM platform (database, osm.org and related services) is an *extremely* complex project from the technical perspective. I have been working for several hundreds man-hours in the past 3 months of my own time on a new History tab (more interactive etc) and I can tell you that this is one of the more complex projects I've ever worked on.

2. OSM (again - platform) is understaffed and underfunded to compete in any real way with such services like Waze, not to mention Google Maps or Bing where you have whole armies of engineers, designers etc.

3. Power of OSM is in the community but I agree that from strategic point of view OSM (osm.org/platform) needs to have more features, be more social, better-looking etc.

After 3 months of hard working on a new big feature for osm.org I can tell you that there is no way that OSM (platform) can compete with all these new hip services without having more contributors and/or having technical staff or contractors working around the clock. This stuff is simply too big, too complex and when you add new features it will consume even more maintenance time of the admins/developers - something has got to give. My guess is that some time in the next few years everything will blow up unless there's major change in how the OSM platform is developed in maintained.

The problem as always is money. I personally would be willing to work full time on the OSM platform but I need to eat and pay my bills like everyone else so I will soon need to go back to a regular job to earn money and my OSM related work will suffer - no new features. There is probably more people like me who would gladly get involved full time but who is going to pay for that?

Paweł

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to