planet-130214.osm.bz2 is now out. On 14 February 2013 11:26, Grant Slater <openstreet...@firefishy.com> wrote: > There is a problem. > I have removed the bad planet.osm files. > > / Grant > > On 14 February 2013 11:06, Walter Nordmann <pil...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> i'm missing new created nodes with 64-bit ids in the extracts of >> geofabrik.de (eg. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/2152011134) >> >> so i tried to check the planet-file and found something strange: *why is the >> planet 8 GB smaller than last week? * Has there been a cleanup or is there a >> problem? >> >> planet-130213.osm.bz2 14-Feb-2013 02:11 18G >> planet-130206.osm.bz2 09-Feb-2013 16:11 26G >> planet-130130.osm.bz2 02-Feb-2013 05:14 25G >> planet-130123.osm.bz2 25-Jan-2013 23:36 25G >> planet-130116.osm.bz2 18-Jan-2013 23:23 25G >> planet-130109.osm.bz2 12-Jan-2013 01:53 25G >> planet-130102.osm.bz2 05-Jan-2013 05:08 25G >> >> any ideas? >> >> regards >> walter >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/what-happend-to-planet-osm-tp5749365.html >> Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk mailing list >> talk@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
