Michal Migurski <m...@teczno.com> wrote: > What about “with OSM” instead of “by OSM”? > > -mike. > > --------------------------------------- > michal migurski http://mike.teczno.com > > On Apr 22, 2013, at 7:39 AM, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> wrote: > > > > > The copyright page is now much better than before and IMHO contains > the necessary contents. There are a couple of wording issues that are > already present in the current version that we should address while > we're at it (but that is mainly CWG/OWG turf) but nothing major. > > > > I do have a couple of issues with the icon though. First while I'm > sure we would like to take credit for everything OSMish, doesn't "by > OSM" imply the wrong thing? What we want to say is I suspect "Data by > OSM", that naturally would be rather unwiedly. Further there may be a > potential (legal) issue with using OSM in that way that I need to > discuss with counsel. > > > > But all in all a nice step forward. > > > > Simon > > > > > > Am 22.04.2013 14:40, schrieb Alex Barth: > >> Hello everyone - > >> > >> I'd love to start pushing again on the OSM attribution mark. > >> > >> This is an updated proposal based on an initial RFC from earlier > this year titled "Contributor Mark" [1, 2]. Sorry for the delay in > following up with adjustments based on feedback on the > original thread. > >> > >> Again, the goal of this proposal is to draw more attention to > OpenStreetMap wherever it's used by introducing a visually compelling, > linked symbol for placement on OSM-based works and by explaining > OpenStreetMap better at the place where this symbol links to. > >> > >> Looking forward to your feedback. I'll also be reaching out to > corresponding working groups and OSMF to see how we can move this > forward. > >> > >> Concretely, this RFC proposes > >> > >> 1. Replace current credit "© OpenStreetMap Contributors" with a > visual mark where possible > >> 2. Update `openstreetmap.org/copyright` to explain better OSM, to > invite visitors to join and to allow creators of derivative work to > link back to their sites. > >> > >> The update to the original RFC brings 4 key changes: > >> > >> 1. Rename the proposal from 'Contributor Mark' to 'Attribution > Mark' > >> 2. A completely redesigned mark, containing the letters "OSM" > >> 3. A completely redesigned `/copyright` page, the page the mark > links to. It is much closer to today's `/copyright` > >> 4. The mark is an alternative to "© OpenStreetMap Contributors". > Only where the mark can't be used, "© OpenStreetMap Contributors" may > be used. > >> > >> Please read up on all details on the newly created RFC page: > >> > >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RFC_Attribution_Mark > >> > >> Also take a look at the repository containing artwork and code: > >> > >> https://github.com/osmlab/attribution-mark > >> > >> Alex > >> > >> -- > >> > >> [1] Initial RFC > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2013-January/065784.html > > >> [2] Feedback summary > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2013-January/065860.html > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> talk mailing list > >> talk@openstreetmap.org > >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > > > _______________________________________________ > > talk mailing list > > talk@openstreetmap.org > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Or perhaps "Data from OSM". -- John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com "Reserve your right to think, for it is better to think wrongly than not to think at all." -- Hypatia of Alexandria _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
